Imagine biting into a sweet, creamy layer of vanilla nestled between crisp golden cookies. That's the experience offered by OREO Double Stuf Golden Sandwich Cookies. This review delves into their flavor, nutritional content, and suitability for various dietary needs, providing insights for both indulgent snackers and health-conscious consumers.

OREO Double Stuf Golden Sandwich Cookies, Party Size, 24.95 oz
Jump Ahead To Sections
What Stands Out
Who Should Buy
Nutritionists' Take
Product Evaluation
Product Details
AI Evaluators' Take
What Stands Out
-
Sweet Vanilla Flavor
OREO Double Stuf Golden Sandwich Cookies offer a delightful vanilla taste, making them a perfect treat for those who prefer a sweet, creamy flavor in their snacks. -
Heart-Healthy Option
With 0mg cholesterol per serving, these cookies align with heart health recommendations, making them a suitable option for those monitoring their heart health. -
Low Sodium Content
At just 80mg per serving, the low sodium level of these cookies makes them a better choice for individuals managing their sodium intake.
Who Should Buy?
Suitable for | Not Suitable for |
---|---|
Sweet Tooth SnackersPerfect for those who enjoy a sweet treat without worrying about cholesterol, thanks to its 0mg per serving. |
Sugar-Conscious ConsumersWith 12g of sugars per serving, these cookies may not be suitable for those actively reducing their sugar intake. |
Heart Health WatchersIndividuals monitoring their cholesterol and sodium intake will find these cookies align well with their dietary restrictions. |
Who Should Buy?
suitability |
---|
Sweet Tooth SnackersPerfect for those who enjoy a sweet treat without worrying about cholesterol, thanks to its 0mg per serving. |
Heart Health WatchersIndividuals monitoring their cholesterol and sodium intake will find these cookies align well with their dietary restrictions. |
Sugar-Conscious ConsumersWith 12g of sugars per serving, these cookies may not be suitable for those actively reducing their sugar intake. |
Nutritionists' Take
Discover what nutritionists think about the product and how it affects your health
- Calories: The product contains 150 kcal per serving, which is moderate for a snack but should be consumed mindfully within the daily caloric intake of 2000 kcal as per FDA guidelines.
- Fat: Total fat content is 7g with 2.5g of saturated fat per serving, which should be considered in the context of the USDA recommendations to limit saturated fat intake.
- Cholesterol: Cholesterol is 0mg per serving, aligning well with recommendations to maintain a low cholesterol diet for heart health.
- Protein: The product has less than 1g of protein per serving, which is minimal and not a significant source of protein.
- Carbohydrate: Total carbohydrates are 21g per serving, with 12g of sugars. This accounts for 24% of the daily value for added sugars, which is a consideration for those monitoring sugar intake.
- Sugars: The high sugar content (12g per serving) might not be suitable for those following a low-sugar diet, as it constitutes a significant portion of the daily sugar intake as per FDA guidelines.
- Sodium: At 80mg per serving, the sodium content is relatively low, making it a better choice for those managing sodium intake for heart health.
- Fiber: Contains no dietary fiber, which is a consideration for digestive health and should be supplemented with fiber-rich foods.
- Vitamins: Provides minimal amounts of essential vitamins, with 0% of the daily value for Vitamin D and Calcium.
- Iron: Contains 2% of the daily value for Iron, which is a small contribution to daily iron needs.
Product Evaluation
Criteria | Details |
---|---|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Diabetes Friendliness |
|
Digestive Health |
|
Allergen Free |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Calorific Content |
|
Heart Healthiness |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Texture |
|
Product Details
Ingredients
Sugar, Wheat Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid, Palm Oil, Soybean Oil, Canola Oil, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Salt, Baking Soda, Soy Lecithin, Natural Flavor, Artificial FlavorNutrition Label
Nutrient | Amount |
---|---|
Servings Per Container | 2 cookies (29g) |
Calories | 150kcal |
Total Fat | 7g |
Saturated Fat | 2.5g |
Trans Fat | 0g |
Cholesterol | 0mg |
Sodium | 80mg |
Total Carbohydrate | 21g |
Dietary Fiber | 0g |
Sugars | 12g |
Protein | less than 1g |
Vitamin D | 0mcg |
Calcium | 0mg |
Iron | 0.5mg |
Potassium | 10mg |
Key Features
Flavor | Vanilla |
Nutritional Balance |
|
Heart Healthiness |
|
AI Evaluators' Take ✨
The Indulgent Connoisseur ★ ★ ★ ★
Although the OREO Double Stuf Golden Sandwich Cookies score high on visual appeal and brand reputation, they fall short in flavor complexity and nutritional balance, making them less suitable for those seeking a gourmet experience.
Flavor Complexity | Brand Reputation | Visual Appeal | Texture |
|
|
|
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
Texture |
|
The Artisan Explorer ★ ★ ★
While the cookies excel in visual appeal and brand reputation, their lack of flavor complexity and texture depth may not fully satisfy artisanal taste seekers.
Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Brand Reputation | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
Allergen Free |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
The Baking Aficionado ★ ★ ★
The cookies' high visual appeal and texture are notable, yet the limited flavor complexity and subpar nutritional balance might not meet the standards of a discerning pastry chef.
Flavor Complexity | Allergen Free | Visual Appeal | Texture |
|
|
|
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Allergen Free |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
Texture |
|
The Health-Conscious Foodie ★ ★ ★
Despite their visual appeal, these cookies do not meet the nutritional balance and allergen-free criteria essential for health-conscious consumers, scoring low in several health-related evaluations.
Flavor Complexity | Nutritional Balance | Diabetes Friendliness | Visual Appeal | Texture |
|
|
|
|
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Diabetes Friendliness |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
Texture |
|
The Health-Conscious Baker ★ ★
The cookies' texture and visual appeal are commendable, but their overall lack of nutritional balance and allergen considerations make them less ideal for health-focused bakers.
Flavor Complexity | Nutritional Balance | Diabetes Friendliness | Texture |
|
|
|
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Diabetes Friendliness |
|
Texture |
|
More Products You May Like
About Soov
Soov helps consumers discover products and make informed shopping decisions. We use AI to create unbiased & meticulous product reviews, assortments and how-to guides. Our content is powered by information from product pages, buyer feedback and in-house analyst inputs.