Imagine a snack that satisfies your sweet tooth while being mindful of your heart health. Lance's Nekot Peanut Butter Sandwich Cookies offer just that, with a rich flavor profile and a formulation that caters to health-conscious individuals. This review unpacks the nutritional content, flavor, and how it stands against similar snacks.

Lance Sandwich Cookies, Nekot Peanut Butter, 8 Packs
Jump Ahead To Sections
What Stands Out
Who Should Buy
Nutritionists' Take
Product Evaluation
Product Details
AI Evaluators' Take
What Stands Out
-
Heart-Healthy Choice
With zero trans fats and only 2.5g of saturated fat, these cookies are a heart-friendly snack. The absence of cholesterol further supports cardiovascular health, making them a wise choice for snack lovers. -
Rich in Flavor, Low in Fiber
Though the cookies boast a rich peanut butter flavor, they fall short in fiber, offering less than 1g per serving. This may deter those seeking digestive benefits from their snacks. -
Caloric Consideration for Snack Lovers
Each pack contains 240 calories, which is considerable for a snack. This might be a concern for calorie-conscious consumers looking to maintain or reduce their daily intake.
Who Should Buy?
Suitable for | Not Suitable for |
---|---|
Calorie-Conscious SnackerWith 240 calories per pack, these cookies are best suited for those who manage their caloric intake but still want to indulge occasionally. |
Low-Sodium DietersWith 200mg of sodium per serving, these cookies might not suit those on a strict low-sodium diet. |
Heart Health AdvocatesIndividuals focused on maintaining a healthy heart will find the zero cholesterol and low saturated fat content appealing. |
Who Should Buy?
suitability |
---|
Calorie-Conscious SnackerWith 240 calories per pack, these cookies are best suited for those who manage their caloric intake but still want to indulge occasionally. |
Heart Health AdvocatesIndividuals focused on maintaining a healthy heart will find the zero cholesterol and low saturated fat content appealing. |
Low-Sodium DietersWith 200mg of sodium per serving, these cookies might not suit those on a strict low-sodium diet. |
Nutritionists' Take
Discover what nutritionists think about the product and how it affects your health
- Calories: The product contains 240 calories per serving, which is a significant portion of the daily intake, especially for a snack item. Consumers should be mindful of total daily caloric intake, with an average of 2000 calories per day recommended by the FDA.
- Fat: Total fat is 11g per serving, with 2.5g of saturated fat. The absence of trans fat is beneficial for heart health, aligning with USDA recommendations to limit saturated and trans fats.
- Cholesterol: Contains 0mg of cholesterol, which is beneficial for maintaining healthy cholesterol levels as per the American Heart Association.
- Protein: Provides 4g of protein per serving, which is a modest amount. This can contribute to daily protein needs but is not a significant source.
- Carbohydrate: Total carbohydrates are 33g per serving, with 12g of sugars. The high sugar content should be considered in the context of FDA guidelines, which recommend limiting added sugars to less than 10% of daily caloric intake.
- Sodium: Contains 200mg of sodium per serving, which is 9% of the daily value. This is within the FDA's recommendation to keep daily sodium intake below 2300mg to support cardiovascular health.
- Fiber: Dietary fiber is less than 1g per serving, providing minimal digestive benefits compared to the USDA's recommendation of 25g per day for a 2000-calorie diet.
- Vitamins: Contains minimal amounts of vitamins, with 0% of the daily value for Vitamin D and low percentages for Calcium and Iron.
- Calcium: Provides only 10mg of calcium per serving, which is negligible in the context of daily calcium needs for bone health.
- Iron: Contains 1.4mg of iron per serving, contributing to the daily iron intake, which is beneficial for preventing anemia.
- Potassium: Provides 80mg of potassium per serving, contributing to the daily intake recommendation by the FDA.
Product Evaluation
Criteria | Details |
---|---|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Digestive Health |
|
Allergen Free |
|
Calorific Content |
|
Heart Healthiness |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Texture |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Product Details
Ingredients
Enriched Flour (Wheat Flour, Niacin, Reduced Iron, Thiamine Mononitrate, Riboflavin, Folic Acid), Sugar, Peanut Butter (Roasted Peanuts), Palm And/Or Soybean Oil, Dextrose, Corn Syrup, Salt, Soy Lecithin, Leavening (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate), Whey (Milk)Nutrition Label
Nutrient | Amount |
---|---|
Serving Size | 1 Pack (49g) |
Calories | 240 per serving |
Total Fat | 11g |
Saturated Fat | 2.5g |
Trans Fat | 0g |
Cholesterol | 0mg |
Sodium | 200mg |
Total Carbohydrate | 33g |
Dietary Fiber | <1g |
Total Sugars | 12g |
Added Sugars | 12g |
Protein | 4g |
Vitamin D | 0mcg |
Calcium | 10mg |
Iron | 1.4mg |
Potassium | 80mg |
Key Features
Flavor | Peanut Butter |
Allergens | Wheat, Peanuts, Soy, Milk |
Dietary Preference | Kosher, Vegetarian |
Packaging | Wrapped |
AI Evaluators' Take ✨
The Indulgent Connoisseur ★ ★ ★ ★
Decadent Dan finds the visual appeal and brand reputation of Lance Sandwich Cookies commendable. However, he notes the flavor complexity and texture only partially meet his high standards for indulgence.
Flavor Complexity | Texture | Brand Reputation | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Texture |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
The Organic Trendsetter ★ ★ ★ ★
EcoChic Lana appreciates the flavor complexity and texture of these cookies, rating them well. However, she notes the lack of alignment with her strict criteria on allergen-free content and nutritional balance.
Allergen Free | Brand Reputation |
|
|
Allergen Free |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
The Artisan Explorer ★ ★ ★ ★
CraftBread Chris is pleased with the visual appeal but finds the flavor complexity lacking depth. He notes the cookies do not meet his expectations for allergen-free content, which affects his overall satisfaction.
Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Brand Reputation | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
Allergen Free |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Brand Reputation |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
The Health-Conscious Foodie ★ ★ ★
WholeGrain Becky appreciates the visual appeal but is critical of the nutritional balance and allergen content, finding them not up to par for health-conscious consumers.
Nutritional Balance | Digestive Health | Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Texture | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Digestive Health |
|
Allergen Free |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Texture |
|
Visual Appeal |
|
The Health-Conscious Baker ★ ★
WholesomeWheat Lindsay finds the cookies fall short in both flavor complexity and nutritional balance, providing a rating that reflects her disappointment in these areas.
Nutritional Balance | Digestive Health | Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Texture |
|
|
|
|
|
Nutritional Balance |
|
Digestive Health |
|
Allergen Free |
|
Flavor Complexity |
|
Texture |
|
More Products You May Like
About Soov
Soov helps consumers discover products and make informed shopping decisions. We use AI to create unbiased & meticulous product reviews, assortments and how-to guides. Our content is powered by information from product pages, buyer feedback and in-house analyst inputs.