In the world of snacks, Tate's Bake Shop Tiny Chocolate Chip Cookies stand out with their rich flavor and moderate caloric content. These cookies, ideal for calorie counters and sweet tooth enthusiasts, offer a delightful taste experience. However, health-conscious eaters might find the high saturated fat and sugar content less appealing. Dive into this review to understand more about what makes these cookies both tempting and controversial.
Tate's Bake Shop Tiny Chocolate Chip Cookies, 24 - 1 Oz Bags
Jump Ahead To Sections
What Stands Out
Who Should Buy
Nutritionists' Take
Product Evaluation
Product Details
AI Evaluators' Take
What Stands Out
-
Satisfying Sweetness
Each serving of Tate's Bake Shop Tiny Chocolate Chip Cookies packs 12g of added sugars, offering a delightful sweet treat that's hard to resist. -
Rich in Flavor
The use of semi-sweet chocolate chips and real butter enhances the flavor profile, making these cookies a favorite for those who appreciate a richer taste in their snacks. -
Moderate Caloric Content
With 140 kcal per serving, these cookies align with snack recommendations, making them a suitable option for calorie-conscious consumers.
Who Should Buy?
| Suitable for | Not Suitable for |
|---|---|
Calorie CountersThese cookies are ideal for those who want a quick, sweet snack without exceeding calorie limits, with each bag containing only 140 kcal. |
Health-Conscious EatersDue to the high saturated fat content and significant amount of added sugars, these cookies might not suit those strictly managing their dietary intake. |
Sweet Tooth EnthusiastsPerfect for individuals who crave a rich, sugary treat, as each serving comes with 12g of added sugars. |
Who Should Buy?
| suitability |
|---|
Calorie CountersThese cookies are ideal for those who want a quick, sweet snack without exceeding calorie limits, with each bag containing only 140 kcal. |
Sweet Tooth EnthusiastsPerfect for individuals who crave a rich, sugary treat, as each serving comes with 12g of added sugars. |
Health-Conscious EatersDue to the high saturated fat content and significant amount of added sugars, these cookies might not suit those strictly managing their dietary intake. |
Nutritionists' Take
Discover what nutritionists think about the product and how it affects your health
- Calories: The product contains 140 kcal per serving, which is moderate for a snack. It aligns with general calorie recommendations for snacks around 150 kcal.
- Fat: Total fat is 7g with 4.5g of saturated fat per serving, which is 22% of the daily value. The saturated fat content is on the higher side, and it's recommended to limit saturated fat intake to less than 10% of total daily calories.
- Cholesterol: Contains 25mg of cholesterol per serving, which is 8% of the daily value. This is within the recommended limits for maintaining heart health.
- Protein: Low protein content at 1g per serving, not a significant source of protein.
- Carbohydrate: Total carbohydrates are 16g per serving, with 1g of dietary fiber and 12g of sugars (all added). This contributes to 7% of the daily value for carbohydrates.
- Sugars: High sugar content with 12g of added sugars per serving, which is 23% of the daily value. This is a significant portion of the recommended daily sugar intake.
- Sodium: Contains 160mg of sodium per serving, which is 7% of the daily value. This is considered moderate and aligns with the FDA's recommendation to keep daily sodium intake under 2,300mg to support cardiovascular health.
- Calcium: Provides 10mg of calcium per serving, which is 0% of the daily value. Not a significant source of calcium.
- Iron: Contains 0.5mg of iron per serving, contributing to 4% of the daily value. This is a minor but beneficial amount.
Product Evaluation
| Criteria | Details |
|---|---|
| Nutritional Balance |
|
| Allergen Free |
|
| Cultural Significance |
|
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Heart Healthiness |
|
| Visual Appeal |
|
| Brand Reputation |
|
Product Details
Ingredients
Unbleached flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid, malted barley flour), Semi-sweet chocolate chips (sugar, chocolate liquor, cocoa butter, milkfat, soy lecithin [an emulsifier], natural flavors), Butter, Sugar, Brown sugar, Eggs, Salt, Baking soda, Natural flavorNutrition Label
| Nutrient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Servings per container | 2 servings per container |
| Serving size | 1 bag (28g) |
| Calories | 140kcal |
| Total Fat | 7g |
| Saturated Fat | 4.5g |
| Trans Fat | 0g |
| Cholesterol | 25mg |
| Sodium | 160mg |
| Total Carbohydrate | 16g |
| Dietary Fiber | 1g |
| Total Sugars | 12g |
| Added Sugars | 12g |
| Protein | 1g |
| Vitamin D | 0mcg |
| Calcium | 10mg |
| Iron | 0.5mg |
| Potassium | 50mg |
Key Features
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Nutritional Balance |
|
AI Evaluators' Take ✨
The Organic Trendsetter ★ ★ ★ ★
EcoChic Lana finds Tate's Bake Shop Cookies moderately appealing due to their high brand reputation. However, the lack of emphasis on allergen-free ingredients and nutritional balance scores them lower on her scale.
| Allergen Free | Brand Reputation |
|
|
|
| Allergen Free |
|
| Brand Reputation |
|
The BBQ Pitmaster ★ ★ ★ ★
SmokeyJoe Dan appreciates the moderate heart healthiness and flavor complexity of the cookies but notes the nutritional balance could be better to fit a healthier profile.
| Flavor Complexity | Brand Reputation |
|
|
|
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Brand Reputation |
|
The Baking Aficionado ★ ★ ★
PastryChef Amanda loves the visual appeal and flavor complexity of Tate's cookies, though she notes the nutritional aspects and allergen information could improve to meet broader dietary needs.
| Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
| Allergen Free |
|
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Visual Appeal |
|
The Health-Conscious Foodie ★ ★ ★
WholeGrain Becky finds these cookies fall short in nutritional balance and allergen considerations, making them less suitable for her health-focused audience.
| Nutritional Balance | Allergen Free | Flavor Complexity | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
|
| Nutritional Balance |
|
| Allergen Free |
|
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Visual Appeal |
|
The Comfort Food Critic ★ ★ ★
CozyCakes Marie enjoys the visual appeal and flavor of the cookies but feels they lack in cultural significance and could improve in nutritional content.
| Cultural Significance | Flavor Complexity | Visual Appeal |
|
|
|
|
| Cultural Significance |
|
| Flavor Complexity |
|
| Visual Appeal |
|
More Products You May Like
Chips Ahoy! Chewy Chocolate Chip Cookies, 26 oz, 2 Pack
Chips Ahoy! Chewy Chocolate Chip Cookies offer a similar calorie count but with lower sodium and no cholesterol, which might appeal to those concerned about heart health.
Read Review
Glutino Gluten Free Chocolate Chip Cookies, 8.6 oz (4 Pack)
Glutino Gluten Free Cookies are a great alternative for those avoiding gluten. They offer a similar taste experience with the benefit of being gluten-free, although they still have high sugar content.
Read Review
Amazon Brand Happy Belly Premium Chocolate Chip Cookies, 13 oz
Happy Belly Premium Chocolate Chip Cookies, an Amazon brand, provides a similar flavor profile with a high visual appeal and brand trust, suitable for those loyal to Amazon products.
Read Review
Thinsters Chocolate Chip Cookie Thins, 4 oz
Thinsters Cookies offer a crunchier texture with a slightly higher iron content, appealing to those who prefer a crispier snack with a bit of nutritional bonus.
Read ReviewAbout Soov
Soov helps consumers discover products and make informed shopping decisions. We use AI to create unbiased & meticulous product reviews, assortments and how-to guides. Our content is powered by information from product pages, buyer feedback and in-house analyst inputs.